The world of specialty coffee is undergoing a profound transformation. At the center of the debate lies the so-called “CVA-Gate”—the controversial integration of the Coffee Quality Institute (CQI) and its programs into the Specialty Coffee Association’s (SCA) new evaluation framework, the Coffee Value Assessment (CVA). What might initially seem like a technical adjustment carries far-reaching implications—especially for lesser-known coffee species such as Coffea canephora, commonly known as Robusta.
The coffee market is currently facing a host of challenges: rising prices, the impacts of the climate crisis, unclear requirements of the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), increasing tariffs, and mounting pressure on producers. Amid these turbulent conditions, the introduction of the CVA system feels less like a solution and more like an added burden—especially when it is implemented without thorough training or inclusive participation. What producers need most right now is stability and support, not yet another layer of uncertainty.
The Coffee Value Assessment (CVA) replaces the former Q-certifications and introduces a new, more comprehensive evaluation protocol. Beyond sensory analysis, it incorporates social, environmental, and narrative elements into the overall coffee assessment.
The goal: to enable a fairer evaluation of coffee across all species.
The risks: blending objective tasting with external labels may undermine the foundational principles of blind cupping.
Every transformation brings both opportunities and challenges. For many, the CVA is a chance to introduce greater diversity into the specialty coffee world—especially by expanding the definition of “specialty” to include Coffea species beyond Arabica. However, there is also a risk that CVA may reinforce old asymmetries or even create new ones—for example, by favoring certain certifications or structurally disadvantaging producers who lack access to education or markets.
Although CVA theoretically paves the way for equal recognition of all coffee varieties, there is a real danger that Arabica standards will become the universal benchmark. The origins of this new system lie in a community historically centered on Arabica—namely, the United States. This raises concerns that the cultural and flavor diversity of other species could be sidelined.
A major issue during this transition period is the unequal access to education: buyers trained in CVA face producers who are largely unfamiliar with the system. Smallholder farmers in remote or conflict-affected regions are especially vulnerable. Previously, education around Q-certification was supported by institutions such as USAID—support that is now disappearing. The result: the weakest links in the value chain are the ones most heavily affected.
For C. Canephora, long labeled simply as Robusta and historically excluded from the specialty coffee world, CVA represents both loss and opportunity. The discontinuation of dedicated Canephora training paths, such as the “Q Robusta Grader” certification, removes a vital infrastructure for quality control and development. Yet at the same time, it opens up space for a new narrative: Specialty Canephora can now establish itself as a standalone category—no longer judged by Arabica benchmarks, but with its own identity, sensory profile, and cultural self-understanding.
Despite valid criticism, CVA also presents a unique opportunity to rethink the structure of the specialty coffee world. This moment could be leveraged to build a decentralized, inclusive model—one that recognizes all Coffea species, promotes diversity, and fosters innovation. But realizing that vision will require active participation from the entire community: producers, roasters, buyers, and organizations alike.
Canephora has spent decades in the shadow of Arabica. With CVA, it now has the chance to step into the spotlight—not as a cheap filler or second-rate option, but as an equal and distinct specialty coffee in its own right. Thanks to its resilience to climate stress, wide flavor range, and rich cultural depth, specialty Canephora could become a forward-looking model for other species seeking recognition in the specialty world.
CVA-Gate is more than a technocratic debate over evaluation forms. It is a wake-up call for the specialty coffee community to critically examine the structures of power, access, and representation. If the industry seizes this moment to promote diversity, fairness, and genuine inclusion, what now feels like a crisis could become a true step forward—for C. canephora and beyond.
Sources
Specialty Coffee Association. (2025, April 22). The Specialty Coffee Association and the Coffee Quality Institute announce historic partnership to provide better support and education to the coffee industry. Specialty Coffee Association. https://sca.coffee/sca-news/2025/4/22/the-specialty-coffee-association-and-the-coffee-quality-institute-announce-historic-partnership-to-provide-better-support-and-education-to-the-coffee-industrynbsp
Specialty Coffee Association. (2024, June 28). Cup of Excellence and Alliance for Coffee Excellence form groundbreaking partnership with Specialty Coffee Association. https://sca.coffee/sca-news/cup-of-excellence-and-alliance-for-coffee-excellence-form-groundbreaking-partnership-with-specialty-coffee-association
Daily Coffee News. (2017, September 26). SCA and World Coffee Research partner for International Coffee Day campaign. Daily Coffee News by Roast Magazine.
https://dailycoffeenews.com/2017/09/26/sca-and-world-coffee-research-partner-for-international-coffee-day-campaign/
Jaffee, D. (2012, Spring). The problem with fair trade coffee. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_problem_with_fair_trade_coffee
Michels, R. (1915). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy (E. Paul & C. Paul, Trans.). Hearst’s International Library Company. (Original work published 1911)
photo: BMP Farmers