The Canephora Flavor Wheel

– why the coffee world needs it and how to work with it
The scientifically reviewed and open access Canephora Flavor Wheel finally creates a common, fair sensory language for Coffea canephora. It fills gaps in the established Arabica-centered Flavor Wheel, sensibly classifies attributes such as umami or saltiness, and provides cupping professionals with a practical, standardized tool. This wheel is the result of a peer-reviewed study and was actively supported by our Canephorum community and our cumpa team.
What’s it all about?
The coffee industry has been working with flavor wheels for years, most notably the SCA/CQI Coffee Taster’s Flavor Wheel. This wheel has shaped the language of sensory analysis, but it is based on a narrow database of predominantly Arabica-dominated coffees. For Canephora and other non-Arabica varieties, this means a structural disadvantage. Flavors that are common in Canephora (and are relevant in terms of quality) only appear marginally in the old grid or are hastily interpreted as “faults.”
This is where the new Canephora Flavor Wheel comes in. It depicts the sensory characteristics of Coffea canephora. Not as an “inferior Arabica,” but as a unique taste experience, just as white wine is not “bad red wine.” Different, not inferior.
Why the coffee world needs it
Same language, fairer evaluation: Roasters, Q graders, and producers will use a common vocabulary for Canephora in the future. This will enable comparable quality assessments and pricing on an equal footing.
Better product development: When savory, cocoa, grain, nutty, and even certain wood-notes are positively contextualized, more precise roasting profiles and clearer recipe communication can be the result.
Greater market transparency: A recognized framework makes procurement and storytelling more transparent.
Inclusion & diversity: The wheel opens up portfolio strategies beyond the Arabica norm and supports diverse Coffea species.
What makes the Canephora Flavor Wheel scientifically sound?
The study “Development of a flavor wheel for Coffea canephora using rate-all-that-apply” (Scientific Reports) follows a clear, transparent approach:
Peer review & open access: The work has been externally reviewed and published in a freely accessible format, which enhances its quality and accessibility.
Methodology: RATA (Rate-All-That-Apply): Tasters select all applicable terms from a controlled descriptor list and rate their intensity. This method is efficient, reproducible, and ideal for identifying descriptors that are truly relevant for Canephora.
Goal: A standardized, inclusive vocabulary that connects science and practice and enables globally comparable quality assessments.
Result: A wheel that highlights notes typical of Canephora, balances sensory dimensions (e.g., umami as potentially positive), and contextualizes saltiness rather than labeling it as “flawed” across the board.
What is new or different compared to the SCA/CQI wheel?
The SCA/CQI wheel remains a milestone, but its basis is very Arabica-heavy. The Canephora wheel:
… focuses on Canephora. It does not assume Arabica standards, but defines quality within the Canephora logic.
… reclassifies basic tastes: umami, in combination with sweetness, acidity, and aroma, can contribute positively to complexity. Saltiness is not automatically negative either, but is evaluated in relation to the overall profile.
… opens the mind to “other” positive aspects: spicy and savory, cocoa, nutty, grainy, wood-notes, etc. – descriptors that are common in Canephora profiles and relevant to quality.

Ho to use the Canephora Flavor Wheel
Step by step
1. Setup & calibration
Standardize cupping protocol (water, roast level, resting times, temperatures).
Calibrate panel: anchor terms from the wheel with reference samples (e.g., cocoa, grainy, spicy, herbs, licorice, dark berries, umami references).
2. Think in terms of RATA logic when evaluating
Select all applicable descriptors, not just the “one” that is most accurate.
Record intensity so that quality can be compared in detail.
3. Consider the context
Check the balance: How do sweetness, acidity, bitterness, umami, and saltiness interact?
Always evaluate positive vs. negative in relation to the profile (e.g., umami ≠ flaw; can provide structure).
4. Document & communicate
Use the wheel as a visual record: mark the segments/descriptors that have been carried.
In tenders, purchasing, and training, the wheel ensures a common language—from origin to roastery.
Practical examples: What is changing in the Cup?
Don’t automatically dismiss “hearty and spicy”: when balanced with sweetness and texture, it can add depth and length.
Differentiate between different types of saltiness: a hint of salt can support body and clarity; excessive saltiness, of course, remains a sign of imbalance.
Think of cocoa, grains, nuts, and dark fruits as anchors of quality — not as a stopgap solution.
Umami as a structural player: particularly relevant in natural or experimental preparation.
Community & Contributions
This wheel is a collaborative effort. At our Canephorum Events V2 and V3, Dr. Fabiana Carvalho introduced the Canephora Flavor Wheel and firmly established it within the scene. At the same time, we reported on it extensively with Canephorum, shared Instagram updates, and activated supporters.
Direct support also came from the field: We at cumpa contributed samples from Peru and Panama to the data set, and our team member Paul attended one of the tasting sessions in Zurich, curated and led by Gloria Pedroza (NKG/CQI), among others, which allowed the wheel to be tested in a hands-on context at an early stage. To enable the study to be published as open access, we at cumpa, as the largest supporter, also played a key role in financing the peer review process.
The result is a scientific tool that was designed from the outset by the community for the community and therefore works equally well in the laboratory, roastery, and cupping room.
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
Is the wheel only for “high-end Robusta”?
No. It helps across the entire spectrum – from the basic segment to specialty. Consistent application and accurate calibration are important.
Does it replace the SCA/CQI wheel?
No. It complements it species-specifically. It is still useful for Arabica, but the new wheel is more accurate for Canephora.
How can I get the wheel and the study?
The study is open access in Scientific Reports. Search for the title “Development of a flavor wheel for Coffea canephora using rate-all-that-apply” (Carvalho et al., 2025) or go directly to the study article here. The wheel is documented in it and can be used for training and quality assurance.
Conclusion
The Canephora Flavor Wheel is a milestone for fairness and precision in coffee sensory analysis. It puts Canephora on an equal footing, creates a common language, and opens doors for better quality, better pay, and better communication.
Sources
Carvalho, F. M., Alves, E. A., Artêncio, M. M., Cassago, A. L. L., & Pereira, L. L. (2025). Development of a flavour wheel for Coffea canephora using rate-all-that-apply. Scientific Reports, 15, 16643. (Open Access).















